I don't even have to make any prejudices known; all I do is inform the court that I'm a scientist, and I'm immediately sent home.If you are ever voir dired for a jury in a patent case I hope you make your prejudices known.

I don't even have to make any prejudices known; all I do is inform the court that I'm a scientist, and I'm immediately sent home.If you are ever voir dired for a jury in a patent case I hope you make your prejudices known.
True that. It's the same with engineers.I don't even have to make any prejudices known; all I do is inform the court that I'm a scientist, and I'm immediately sent home.It is apparent that lawyers only want ignorant savages on the jury.
It's a problem that you think I'm not a poker player? How do you know what I am or what I am not? I thought this was a discussion board about E* and Tivo. I didn't realize I stumbled upon a poker game.
I don't see how it's any of your business what I am. Stick to the subject, not the people. If you can't do that I suggest you put me on ignore.
Game? You're playing a game? I'm not in the mood to play games. Once again, stick to the subject or be gone.
And the best part is Charlie can't appeal contempt. He was told by a court of law to do something and didn't. You can't appeal the punishment for not listening to what a judge told you to do.
I don't even have to make any prejudices known; all I do is inform the court that I'm a scientist, and I'm immediately sent home.It is apparent that lawyers only want ignorant savages on the jury.
You simply have no ability to read yourself.
Just left-click on the name, and it's at the bottom of the pop up menu. I guess that was not obvious, so probably somebody patented it and you'll have to pay them to use it.Can someone tell me where the "ignore" function is? Is there one? I can't seem to find it.
Just left-click on the name, and it's at the bottom of the pop up menu. I guess that was not obvious, so probably somebody patented it and you'll have to pay them to use it.![]()
Just left-click on the name, and it's at the bottom of the pop up menu. I guess that was not obvious, so probably somebody patented it and you'll have to pay them to use it.![]()
I believe he is quite correct about that. this litigation will probably be over long before that will. Frankly it looks to me like the patent re-examination is just sour grapes on the part of Dish in case they lose. If they can't win, they want to make sure no one does. If anything I take it as an indication that they don't believe they will win in court.The guy just came on board today, before finding where the ignore button was, started to lecture everyone that the patent claim validation is irrelevant to this whole litigation,
Not true, you are correct there, but a preliminary injunction or new or updated final injunction, even if appealed is much less likely to be stayed this time around. So an appeal may not be very helpful. We will just have to wait and see about that part.and a contempt ruling could not be appealed,
Back to the ex parte examination again? This has been well discussed. The new issues are simply a retry based on two patents that were presented, but not thoroughly evaluated at the last re-examination. The new twist is that both prior art patents have to be used in conjunction with each other to possibly invalidate the TiVo claims. The examiner will look at it. there may have been good reason why they were not thoroughly looked over the first time around.and his bet was the claims will be validated because it was validated last time,
assuming TiVo wins. Dish knows this and still is stringing things out. They obviously believe the delays are worth any additional costs if they lose and know there is no downside at all if they win. Dish did the math, they know what they are doing here.and the longer the wait, {for the current litigation to end} the more severe the damage.
I believe he is quite correct about that. this litigation will probably be over long before that will. Frankly it looks to me like the patent re-examination is just sour grapes on the part of Dish in case they lose. If they can't win, they want to make sure no one does. If anything I take it as an indication that they don't believe they will win in court.
Richard Cranium? Bahahahahaha! Too funny....It's a scorched earth policy. Charlie knows he's toast and he's attempting to take his ball and go home.
Unfortunately for Charlie he already tried this once and failed miserably, just as he will fail miserably this time and the next time too.
He can keep spending money trying to have the patents invalidated but he's just wasting his shareholders money. I wouldn't be surprised if there was a class action suit against Charlie and E* the way things have been handled.
Anyway, this whole Hail Mary has no bearing on TX or DE. Especially since DE is already washing their hands of Charlie and sending him back to where he belongs. TX. I can't imagine that the Judge in TX is going to be happy to hear that Charlie has been sneaking around trying to go over his head.
If you ask me, Charlie is playing with fire. He's begging for treble damages.![]()
Oh fiddlesticks. A scorched earth policy would have Charlie buying out Tivo, canning everyone who was ever associated with the firm, and then turning around and suing everybody else for patent infringement.It's a scorched earth policy. Charlie knows he's toast and he's attempting to take his ball and go home.
I believe he is quite correct about that. this litigation will probably be over long before that will.
Frankly it looks to me like the patent re-examination is just sour grapes on the part of Dish in case they lose. If they can't win, they want to make sure no one does. If anything I take it as an indication that they don't believe they will win in court.
Not true, you are correct there,
but a preliminary injunction or new or updated final injunction, even if appealed is much less likely to be stayed this time around. So an appeal may not be very helpful. We will just have to wait and see about that part.
Back to the ex parte examination again? This has been well discussed. The new issues are simply a retry based on two patents that were presented, but not thoroughly evaluated at the last re-examination. The new twist is that both prior art patents have to be used in conjunction with each other to possibly invalidate the TiVo claims. The examiner will look at it. there may have been good reason why they were not thoroughly looked over the first time around.
assuming TiVo wins. Dish knows this and still is stringing things out. They obviously believe the delays are worth any additional costs if they lose and know there is no downside at all if they win. Dish did the math, they know what they are doing here.
In as little as two weeks, My guess, we should hear from DE and TX and have real new information to discuss and can put some of this idle speculation to bed.
Oh fiddlesticks. A scorched earth policy would have Charlie buying out Tivo, canning everyone who was ever associated with the firm, and then turning around and suing everybody else for patent infringement.
Patents that have already been reexamined and emerged unscathed (as the TiVo patent did) are much more bulletproof than patents being reexamined for the first time. Every claim of TiVo's patent was reexamined. Each and every one.72% of the chance the patent claims are invalidated in whole or in part. This much is undisputed.
Patents that have already been reexamined and emerged unscathed are much more bulletproof than patents being reexamined for the first time.
Limited time offer