Rey @ your service Supporting Founder Feb 8, 2008 27,003 586 Florida Oct 14, 2008 #41 Hemi 6.1 said: You know , come to think of it ,If directv went Mpeg 4 on the 101, That would save a ton of space, Right? But then yes everyone would have to upgrade to an Mpeg 4 receiver. That would cost big bucks. Click to expand... this is why it's so far down the road.
Hemi 6.1 said: You know , come to think of it ,If directv went Mpeg 4 on the 101, That would save a ton of space, Right? But then yes everyone would have to upgrade to an Mpeg 4 receiver. That would cost big bucks. Click to expand... this is why it's so far down the road.
G Greg Bimson SatelliteGuys Pro Jan 21, 2004 1,863 0 Oct 14, 2008 #42 And since the "future" is HD, if PQ is of absolute importance, the PQ will be on the Ka-band slots, requiring H-series receivers. There is no sense to change from MPEG2 on 101/110/119. Any change to MPEG4 on those slots requires massive amounts of receiver replacements.
And since the "future" is HD, if PQ is of absolute importance, the PQ will be on the Ka-band slots, requiring H-series receivers. There is no sense to change from MPEG2 on 101/110/119. Any change to MPEG4 on those slots requires massive amounts of receiver replacements.
sundude90 SatelliteGuys Pro Original poster Jun 13, 2008 1,532 76 Waterville, Maine, United States Oct 20, 2008 #43 I understand now, sorry about that! All this stuff is kinda confusing until you get to know it better. Thanks
I understand now, sorry about that! All this stuff is kinda confusing until you get to know it better. Thanks
