tonyp56 said:Six more months.![]()
I don't know, but I'd rather them wait until they get EVERY thing fixed before they release the software. That way, 1 SW release=total fix without ANY bugs!
tonyp56 said:Six more months.![]()
I don't know, but I'd rather them wait until they get EVERY thing fixed before they release the software. That way, 1 SW release=total fix without ANY bugs!
Carl B said:(because they are using all of it to bring locals to places like Podunk, OK)
WeeJavaDude said:Obviously not in the software field Tony. Any time you release software new bugs are introduced while other ones are squished. The goal is to squish a lot more than you created. What you don't what is a Hydra release.
If your expectations are total fix with no new bugs, you are going to be disappointed. My hope is that the next release will be stable with no new major bugs while fixing some of the functionality that is not working properly.
The Rumblings I have heard have been October.
tonyp56 said:To begin with, I was JUST stating that I'd rather Dish not release software until they actually had something worth releasing (fixes bugs, activates features, etc...) Why release software that is pointless? (I know just because I don't see a difference, doesn't mean the new software doesn't do something!)
tonyp56 said:I realize that no SW is perfect, BUT, there is no excuse to release a product that has as many problems as the 811 (or the 301, 311, 322, 522, 921, 721, 6000, etc...) did/has.(We shouldn't have ever talked about a dark video issue, the 811 should have had Fav lists that actually hold more than 120 channels, Dish Home should have been activated from the beginning, and etc...) My point about not releasing more software until they get things fixed is very simple, why release software today, then two, three, four, etc. weeks from now release another SW ver. then in another month release another SW release. Why not consolidate all these little, pointless SW releases into ONE. Also why not take the time to test the newer SW to make sure that they are not adding more bugs, or at the very least no major bugs. I have had my 811 for over six months, and it is finally working like it should have when I first got it. There is no excuse for that, I don't care how imperfect you say software is!
Sorry. But, no. You don't.mdonnelly said:Hey, I live in Podunk, OK. I have as much right to locals as any city slicker.![]()
That's just crazy talk!tonyp56 said:I don't know, but I'd rather them wait until they get EVERY thing fixed before they release the software. That way, 1 SW release=total fix without ANY bugs!
WeeJavaDude said:I am sure people that benefit from the release would have a different opiniont.However, there have been some questionable 811 releases that have me puzzeled. Since I am not prevy to the software release I just chalk it up as not knowing the whole picture.
WeeJavaDude said:1) If they were to wait until they fixed everything they knew about, it would be a lot longer cycle than we currently have and a lot more customer pain in the long run. Imagine what the out cry would be if they waited 8 months after the intial release to fix all the issues that have been addressed since last December. I don't think there would have been anybody left using an 811. As to why the 811 was released in that state to begin with is another question. Could be number of reason including part issues etc.
YesWeeJavaDude said:I am assuming your 39 seconds includes an acquiring signal?
WeeJavaDude said:Don't read this wrong, There are way to produce good and bad software. Yes all software has its bugs. Some are more reliable than others. The point I was making is that having the expectations that a box is bug free is not pratical. Having the expectations that all mainly work as designed and the box is reliable is more than fair.
and vice-versaWeeJavaDude said:Hopefully I glarified my position and thoughts.
GaryPen said:That's just crazy talk!![]()
tonyp56 said:I understand your point, but, which bugs you the most, that it takes so long for them to fix something, or that they release "new" software often, but you don't see a difference in what you experience?
tonyp56 said:Same as above, yes, waiting a long time to get something fixed isn't good, but wouldn't having several issue's fixed be worth the wait! Point 2, I am not asking for "all customer related bugs to be fixed" I am only asking that they try to take care of as many things as they can before releasing their software. Point 3, true, but isn't this were beta testers come in. True even with real beta testers there will still be things that slip through the cracks, but will they be as many or as bad. Why is it Dish uses their paying customers as beta testers? But like I said, even with beta testers their will still be bugs, in other words I am not refuting that.
tonyp56 said:The difference that I saw between Dish and DTV as far as lockups, bugs, etc. was like day and night. True everyone can see different issues, but it was like the difference between DOS 5.0 and Windows 95 to me. (yes that extreme, when you take the guide, menus, and just general problems, granted there was some things that my 301's had that none of my DTV receivers had like caller ID, Dish Home, etc. It's the fact that the features that DTV's receivers had worked more reliabaly)
tonyp56 said:I don't take it the wrong way, I was just trying to clarify my own POV, and I do understand how it is software isn't always perfect, and how you can't have a 100% bug free piece of software, it's just the way Dish does their SW releases, and how it seems that their receivers have more bugs than others. Perhaps I should have worded my post better, but that was the point I was trying to make, not to say no one else can have a different POV. I just felt that you didn't understand or I didn't fully convey my POV.
and vice-versa
You know what happens when you assume!keith said:I wish I were part of the 811 beta program, assuming there is one.
GaryPen said:You know what happens when you assume!
Limited time offer